Inland Empire Criminal Defense
Categories

Request a Free Consult

Name(Required)
Please provide as much detail as possible, case number, court date, etc.

Penal Code 241.1/Penal Code 245.3: Assault on a Custodial Officer Laws in California

PC 241.1/PC 245.3: Assault on a Custodial Officer

Legal Definition:

PC 241.1 “When an assault is committed against the person of a custodial officer as defined in Section 831 or 831.5, and the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a custodial officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, the offense shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.”

PC 245.3: “Every person who commits an assault with a deadly weapon or instrument or by any means likely to produce great bodily injury upon the person of a custodial officer as defined in Section 831 or 831.5, and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a custodial officer engaged in the performance of that person’s duties, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or five years.

When a person is convicted of a violation of this section in a case involving the use of a deadly weapon or instrument, and such weapon or instrument is owned by that person, the court may, in its discretion, order that the weapon or instrument be deemed a nuisance and shall be confiscated and destroyed in the manner provided by Sections 18000 and 18005.”

For a person to be convicted of a violation of PC 241.1 the prosecution must show that:

1. You did any act that by its nature would directly and probably result in the application of force to a person;

2. You did this act willfully;

3. When you acted, you were aware of facts that would lead a reasonable person to realize that your act by its nature would directly and probably result in the application of force to someone;

4. When you did this act, you had the present ability to apply force to a person;

5. When you acted, the person assault was lawfully performing their duties as a custodial officer;

6. When you acted, you knew or reasonably should have known, both that the person assaulted was a custodial officer and that they were performing their duties as a custodial officer;

AND

7. You did not act in Self Defense or Defense of a Third Party.

For a person to be convicted of a violation of PC 245.3 the prosecution must show that:

1. You willfully did an act with a deadly weapon that by its nature would directly and probably result in the application of force to a person;

OR

2. You did an act that by its nature would directly and probably result in the application of force to a person that would produce great bodily harm;

3. You did this act willingly;

4. When you acted, you were aware of facts that would lead a reasonable person to realize that your act by its nature would directly and probably result in the application of force to someone;

5. When you acted, you had the present ability to apply force likely to cause great bodily injury or with a deadly weapon to a person;

6. When you acted, the person assault was lawfully performing their duties as a custodial officer;

7. When you acted, you knew or reasonably should have known, both that the person assaulted was a custodial officer and that they were performing their duties as a custodial officer;

AND

8. You did not act in Self Defense or Defense of a Third Party.

What does this mean?

Someone commits an act willfully when he or she does it willingly or on purpose. It is not required that he or she intend to break the law, hurt someone else, or gain any advantage. The terms application of force and apply force mean to touch in a harmful or offensive manner. The slightest touching can be enough if it is done in a rude or angry way. Making contact with another person, including through his or her clothing, is enough. The touching does not have to cause pain or injury of any kind.

The touching can be done indirectly or by causing an object or another person to touch the other person. No person needs to actually even be injured under PC 241.1 by your act to be charged with this crime. A custodial officer is someone who works for law enforcement of a city or county, and is responsible for making custody of prisoners, and helps operate a local detention facility. In other words, it is the person who works in a jail, after you are being detained or arrested.

Great bodily injury means significant or substantial physical injury. It is an injury that is greater than minor or moderate harm. A deadly weapon is any object, instrument, or weapon [that is inherently deadly or one] that is used in such a way that it is capable of causing and likely to cause death or great bodily injury. An object is inherently deadly if it is deadly or dangerous in the ordinary use for which it was designed.

Penalties

An assault on a custodial officer under PC 241.1 is a wobbler offense. That means it can be a felony or a misdemeanor offense. Whether it is a felony or a misdemeanor charge depends on the specific facts of your case as well as your criminal history. A misdemeanor conviction under this section can lead to up to one year in a County Jail. If you are convicted of this charge as a felony, you can be sentenced to upwards of 16 months, 2, or 3 years in a County Jail Prison. You would be required to serve at least 50% of that time in custody. An assault causing great bodily injury or with a deadly weapon is a felony-only offense. A conviction under this section can lead to a punishment of upwards of 3, 4, or 5 years in a State Prison. You would be required to serve at least 50% of that time in custody. PC 241.1 is not a strike offense under the Three Strikes Law, and it is also not a charge requiring Sex Registration under PC 290. If you are convicted of PC 245.3 it is a strike offense, but not a charge requiring registration under PC 290. You would likely face a loss, suspension, or revocation of your professional license. You could also face immigration consequences if you are a non-US Citizen living in the United States since this would be a violent crime in Federal Law. A violation under PC 245.3 is considered a “serious” felony under PC 1192.7  and is also a crime of moral turpitude. Also, keep in mind, most often this offense happens when you are being arrested or already in police custody for a crime. Thus, these charges are added to whatever crime led you to be in contact with a custodial officer in the first place. In other words, you wouldn’t be charged with this crime at the grocery store, since a custodial officer will not be in the performance of their duties while shopping for groceries.

Common Defenses

1. Statute of Limitations

2. Insufficient Evidence

3. Violation of Rights

4. Self Defense

If the custodial officer was not acting in their duties, for example, if they were making an illegal arrest of you or a loved one, then you could not be found guilty under this section for assault on a Custodial Officer. Of course, this is not an invitation to attack custodial officers if they are arresting you, but it can be a defense down the line if that’s what the officer was doing. This would show that there is insufficient evidence to find you guilty of the crime.

Further, if you are acting in the defense of others, then you cannot be found guilty under this section. For example, if you see a custodial officer arresting another, and you see the officer is potentially killing the other person, and you interfere by pushing the police officer off of the person being arrested to save them, you would not be guilty under this section either. However, if the officer makes a statement to you that you find offensive, no matter how offensive the words may be, it is NOT a defense to the attack and assaults the police officer for their words alone.

Call Today

Facing charges related to assaults on custodial officers, under sections PC 241.1 and PC 245.3, presents a uniquely challenging legal battle. With prosecutors typically adopting a more aggressive stance due to the involvement of law enforcement officers as victims, defendants often confront the daunting prospect of severe penalties and extended incarceration.

Why Choose Inland Empire Criminal Defense?

  • Specialized Legal Expertise: Our team boasts a distinguished track record in defending against charges involving assaults on custodial officers. This specialized focus endows us with a profound understanding of the intricacies and best defense strategies pertinent to these cases.
  • Aggressive Advocacy: Recognizing the intensified prosecutorial zeal in these scenarios, we counter with a defense that is both formidable and meticulously orchestrated. Our commitment is to ensure your voice is heard, your rights are protected, and the scales of justice are balanced in your favor.
  • Comprehensive Support: From the moment you engage with us, you’ll find a partner dedicated to navigating you through this tumultuous period. We offer round-the-clock availability to address your concerns, ensuring you’re never left to face this challenge alone.

Your Path to Defense

In situations where the legal system seems overwhelmingly arrayed against you, securing the right legal representation can be the key to preserving your freedom and future. Inland Empire Criminal Defense is poised to stand by your side, offering the expert guidance and assertive defense necessary to challenge the charges against you.

Begin Your Defense Journey Today

Don’t delay in taking the vital steps needed to defend yourself against these serious accusations. Contact Inland Empire Criminal Defense for a complimentary initial consultation, and let us start crafting a defense strategy tailored to your unique situation. Dial 909-939-7126 to reach our Ontario, CA, office, where our dedicated team awaits to champion your cause.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)

Does the attorney offer confidential consultations?

Absolutely, Inland Empire Criminal Defense prioritizes your privacy and confidentiality. Every consultation with our attorney is conducted with the utmost discretion, ensuring your information remains secure and private.

Does the attorney offer payment plans?

Yes, understanding the financial pressures that can come with legal representation, our attorney offers flexible payment plans. This approach ensures that quality legal defense is accessible for all our clients in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.

Is the consultation free?

Yes, Inland Empire Criminal Defense offers free consultations. This is part of our commitment to providing accessible and transparent legal services to residents of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.

Are the consultations in person or only over the phone?

We offer both in-person and over-the-phone consultations to accommodate your preferences and needs. Whether you’re in Riverside, San Bernardino, or Los Angeles County, we ensure that you can access our legal services in the way that suits you best.

Is the office open on weekends?

Our office is typically closed on weekends. However, we do make exceptions for meetings by special arrangement. Our commitment is to be as accommodating as possible to meet the unique needs of our clients in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.

Does the attorney serve all of California?

Our legal services are specifically tailored to residents of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties. For cases outside these areas, we recommend consulting avvo.com to find appropriate legal assistance. Our focused approach allows us to provide specialized defense catering to the unique legal landscape of these counties.

Content is protected. Right-click function is disabled.