Deciphering the Law and Potential Defenses

In California, ensuring public safety and preventing lewd behavior in public spaces is a paramount concern. One of the laws addressing this issue is California Penal Code 647(D), which deals with the act of loitering in public toilets for lewd acts. At Inland Empire Criminal Defense, we are committed to helping you understand this law and the possible defenses available if you are facing charges.

California Penal Code 647(D): An In-Depth Look

California Legal Definition: “Every person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor: (D) Who loiters in or about any toilet open to the public for the purpose of engaging in or soliciting any lewd or lascivious or any unlawful act.”

In simpler terms, PC 647(D) makes it a misdemeanor to loiter in or around public toilets with the intent to engage in or solicit lewd or unlawful acts. Understanding this law is crucial to navigate potential legal challenges effectively.

Proving a Case Under PC 647(D)

To secure a conviction under PC 647(D), the prosecution must establish the following elements:

1. The defendant loitered in or around a public toilet.
2. The defendant did so with the intent to engage in or solicit lewd, lascivious, or unlawful acts.

Defenses Under PC 647(D)

Defending against charges under PC 647(D) necessitates a comprehensive strategy. Here are several examples of defenses tailored to this law:

1. Lack of Intent

A strong defense may involve demonstrating that the defendant did not have the requisite intent to engage in or solicit lewd, lascivious, or unlawful acts. If the intent cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, it may lead to an acquittal.

2. False Accusations

In some cases, individuals may be wrongly accused of loitering for lewd acts due to misunderstandings or personal vendettas. A thorough investigation can help uncover the truth.

3. Mistaken Identity

Challenging the accuracy of the identification of the defendant as the loiterer can be a powerful defense strategy. If there is reasonable doubt about the defendant’s identity, it can cast doubt on the case.

4. Entrapment

If law enforcement or an informant induced or coerced the defendant into loitering for lewd acts when they would not have done so otherwise, it may constitute entrapment and serve as a defense.

While these are several examples of defenses, it’s important to note that there may be other potential defenses depending on the specifics of your case. Consulting with an experienced attorney is essential to building a robust defense tailored to your unique situation.

Inland Empire Criminal Defense: Your Trusted Legal Advocate

At Inland Empire Criminal Defense, we have a deep understanding of California’s laws, including those related to lewd acts in public toilets. If you are facing charges under PC 647(D), it’s crucial to have a legal advocate who will tirelessly defend your rights and future.

Don’t let accusations dictate your life’s trajectory. Act promptly and decisively. Call Inland Empire Criminal Defense—your trusted Rancho Cucamonga Criminal Defense Attorney—at 909-939-7126. Secure legal representation well-versed in California criminal law, dedicated to protecting your freedom. Our office is conveniently located in Ontario, ensuring accessibility when you need us most.