PC 647(i): Peeping Tom
Legal Definition: every person…who, while loitering, prowling, or wandering upon the private property of another, at any time, peeks in the door or window of any inhabited building or structure, without visible or lawful business with the owner or occupant…is guilty of disorderly conduct.
To be found guilty under PC 647(i), the prosecution must prove that:
1. You delayed, lingered, prowled, or wandered on the private property of someone else;
2. When you were on that property, you did not have a lawful purpose for being there;
AND
3. When you were on the property, you peeked in the door or window of any inhabited building or structure.
What does this mean?
When the code indicates you did not have a lawful purpose to be present, it doesn’t mean you necessarily intended to commit a further crime, such as Rape, it just means that you were not legally allowed to be present at that time. In other words, at the least, you were Trespassing on another person’s property that was not your own. A building/structure is inhabited if someone uses it as a dwelling, whether or not someone is inside at the time of the alleged peeking. Even if the person leaves their home, if you are peeking inside, you can still be charged under this section. A building/or structure is not inhabited if the former residents have moved out and do not intend to return, even if some personal property remains inside. As you can tell, this is a very fact-specific analysis.
This section exists to protect a person’s basic right to have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes. This type of charge is another way of looking at what people have commonly known as Stalking. Here, it involves being inside of a residence to “peep” on another person, such as a love interest, or possible love interest. There are other possible charges that can go with this section, such as Burglary if you are breaking and entering a dwelling at night, to commit a felony offense. Another way to look at this in more recent nomenclature is to “creep” on another person inside of their home.
Penalties
A conviction under PC 647(i) is a misdemeanor offense. If you are convicted, you can be sentenced to County Jail for up to six months. You would be required to serve at least 50% of that sentence in custody. You can also be subject to Criminal Protective Orders forbidding you from going near the victim’s home, Victim Restitution as well as fines and fees upwards of over $1000.
This is not a strike offense under the California Three Strikes law, and it is not a Sex Offense under PC 290. However, if a Judge were to determine that the reason for your “Peeping” was based on an unnatural sexual desire, you could be forced to register. You could also face a loss of your Professional License if convicted and if not a legal resident, could face Deportation in Immigration Court.
Common Defenses
- Statute of Limitations
- Violation of Rights
- Insufficient Evidence
- False Accusations
- Coerced Confessions
To show that there is insufficient evidence to be able to prove you guilty of this crime, you would need to have shown that the required elements above have not been proved by the Prosecution. For example, if the house you are peeping inside is broken down and uninhabited and no person is living there or plans to return, then it cannot be considered a “home” under this section. In that sense, you cannot have been peeping on, and invading another person’s privacy, if there is no person that resides there.
Another possible element to attack would be to prove that you were not on the private property for an unlawful purpose, but rather, for lawful reasons. This helps protects workers at a home, who are presently doing repairs, from any possibility that it is determined that person is peeping on the current residents. Obviously, if a worker is hired to do work within a home, then their presence on the property is lawful, and therefore not a violation under this section.
Call Today
Facing charges under PC 647(i), known colloquially as “Peeping Tom” laws, can have severe consequences, including incarceration, restraining orders that prevent contact with the alleged victim, and significant financial penalties. Beyond the immediate legal repercussions, a conviction can tarnish your criminal record, potentially derailing future employment opportunities. Employers might view a “peeping” charge with serious concern, potentially disqualifying you from job consideration.
Inland Empire Defense, located in Ontario, specializes in defending individuals accused under the Peeping Tom laws of PC 647(i). Our experienced PC 647(i) Ontario attorney has a strong track record of successfully navigating the complexities of these sensitive charges, ensuring a robust defense for our clients.
Why Choose Inland Empire Defense for Your PC 647(i) Case?
- Proven Defense Strategies: Our attorney has extensive experience with the specific nuances of PC 647(i) charges, enabling us to craft effective defense strategies that address the unique aspects of each case.
- Comprehensive Legal Support: We understand the stress and uncertainty that come with facing these charges. Our team is committed to providing you with comprehensive legal support, ensuring that your rights are protected throughout the legal process.
- Round-the-Clock Availability: Recognizing the urgency of your situation, we offer 24/7 availability to address your concerns and answer any questions you may have.
Contact Us for a Strong Defense Against Peeping Charges
If you or someone you know is facing charges under PC 647(i), it’s crucial to act swiftly to secure experienced legal representation. Inland Empire Defense is ready to defend your rights and work towards the most favorable outcome possible.
Reach Out to Inland Empire Defense Now
Don’t let a peeping charge define your future. Contact us at 909-939-7126 to discuss your case and learn how our expertise can make a difference. Our initial consultation is free, allowing us to assess your situation and begin formulating a defense strategy tailored to your needs. Trust your local Rancho Cucamonga Criminal Defense Attorney at Inland Empire Defense, strategically located in Ontario, to provide the dedicated and effective representation you require.
Frequently Asked Questions
Absolutely, Inland Empire Criminal Defense prioritizes your privacy and confidentiality. Every consultation with our attorney is conducted with the utmost discretion, ensuring your information remains secure and private.
Yes, understanding the financial pressures that can come with legal representation, our attorney offers flexible payment plans. This approach ensures that quality legal defense is accessible for all our clients in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.
Yes, Inland Empire Criminal Defense offers free consultations. This is part of our commitment to providing accessible and transparent legal services to residents of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.
We offer both in-person and over-the-phone consultations to accommodate your preferences and needs. Whether you’re in Riverside, San Bernardino, or Los Angeles County, we ensure that you can access our legal services in the way that suits you best.
Our office is typically closed on weekends. However, we do make exceptions for meetings by special arrangement. Our commitment is to be as accommodating as possible to meet the unique needs of our clients in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties.
Our legal services are specifically tailored to residents of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties. For cases outside these areas, we recommend consulting avvo.com to find appropriate legal assistance. Our focused approach allows us to provide specialized defense catering to the unique legal landscape of these counties.